<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 977 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378533</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay dismissed the appeals challenging the deletion of concealment penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s finding that the assessee&#039;s claim was based on a bonafide interpretation of the law and not an intentional misrepresentation. Emphasizing that penalty proceedings should not stem from the rejection of a genuine claim, the court cited precedent to support its decision. The revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of the penalty was rejected, affirming that a bonafide claim, even if ultimately disallowed, does not automatically lead to a penalty imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2019 10:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567292" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 977 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378533</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay dismissed the appeals challenging the deletion of concealment penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s finding that the assessee&#039;s claim was based on a bonafide interpretation of the law and not an intentional misrepresentation. Emphasizing that penalty proceedings should not stem from the rejection of a genuine claim, the court cited precedent to support its decision. The revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of the penalty was rejected, affirming that a bonafide claim, even if ultimately disallowed, does not automatically lead to a penalty imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378533</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>