<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 976 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378532</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, ruling that conditions introduced prospectively cannot be retroactively applied to deny deductions for breaches occurring before the conditions were enacted. The Court dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, highlighting the irrelevance of proportionate disallowance in light of the factual and legal considerations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2019 16:37:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567290" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 976 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378532</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, ruling that conditions introduced prospectively cannot be retroactively applied to deny deductions for breaches occurring before the conditions were enacted. The Court dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, highlighting the irrelevance of proportionate disallowance in light of the factual and legal considerations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378532</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>