<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 968 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378524</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the preemptive petition filed by a Co-operative Bank seeking to restrain the respondents from passing an order of assessment. The court held that the petitioner cannot bypass statutory provisions through a writ petition and prevent departmental authorities from exercising their powers. Emphasizing the importance of allowing departmental authorities to follow statutory procedures without interference, the court refused to grant relief and cautioned against premature interventions in tax matters. The petition was disposed of summarily without making any observations on the case&#039;s merits to avoid prejudice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2019 12:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 968 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378524</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the preemptive petition filed by a Co-operative Bank seeking to restrain the respondents from passing an order of assessment. The court held that the petitioner cannot bypass statutory provisions through a writ petition and prevent departmental authorities from exercising their powers. Emphasizing the importance of allowing departmental authorities to follow statutory procedures without interference, the court refused to grant relief and cautioned against premature interventions in tax matters. The petition was disposed of summarily without making any observations on the case&#039;s merits to avoid prejudice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378524</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>