<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 961 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378517</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the deduction under Section 54F based on the actual sale consideration received by the assessee, annulling the assessment order due to the absence of a notice under Section 143(2). The Tribunal also upheld the deletion of unexplained bank deposit additions and did not address the issues related to the classification of land and deductions under Sections 54B and 54F due to the annulment of the assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2019 16:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567265" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 961 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378517</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the deduction under Section 54F based on the actual sale consideration received by the assessee, annulling the assessment order due to the absence of a notice under Section 143(2). The Tribunal also upheld the deletion of unexplained bank deposit additions and did not address the issues related to the classification of land and deductions under Sections 54B and 54F due to the annulment of the assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>