<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 958 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378514</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax under section 263, ruling that the original assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the revenue&#039;s interest. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer had conducted adequate enquiries, and the Principal Commissioner failed to justify invoking section 263. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee, with the Tribunal emphasizing the sufficiency of the AO&#039;s investigations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2019 16:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 958 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378514</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax under section 263, ruling that the original assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the revenue&#039;s interest. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer had conducted adequate enquiries, and the Principal Commissioner failed to justify invoking section 263. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee, with the Tribunal emphasizing the sufficiency of the AO&#039;s investigations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378514</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>