<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 957 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378513</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court&#039;s order, and remanded the case for a fresh decision. The Court emphasized the necessity for the High Court to address specific substantial questions of law related to the validity of the notice, existence of escaped assessment, and the basis for adding the sum to the total income under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2019 12:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567255" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 957 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378513</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court&#039;s order, and remanded the case for a fresh decision. The Court emphasized the necessity for the High Court to address specific substantial questions of law related to the validity of the notice, existence of escaped assessment, and the basis for adding the sum to the total income under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>