<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 953 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378509</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the penalty under section 271AAB of the IT Act is discretionary, the initiation of penalty proceedings was invalid due to defective notices, and the disclosed income did not qualify as undisclosed income. Consequently, the penalty order was quashed, and the penalty was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2019 15:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 953 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378509</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the penalty under section 271AAB of the IT Act is discretionary, the initiation of penalty proceedings was invalid due to defective notices, and the disclosed income did not qualify as undisclosed income. Consequently, the penalty order was quashed, and the penalty was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378509</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>