https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378504 The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order. The Tribunal clarified that its earlier order only set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order for the specific appellants, not all parties. It upheld the jurisdiction of the Additional Director DRI to issue the Show Cause Notice, citing relevant case law. The Tribunal found the charges of under-invoicing against the appellants valid, distinguishing the case from precedents and noting corroborating evidence. The decision was made on 12.04.2019. en-us Fri, 12 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Apr 2019 15:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378504 The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order. The Tribunal clarified that its earlier order only set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order for the specific appellants, not all parties. It upheld the jurisdiction of the Additional Director DRI to issue the Show Cause Notice, citing relevant case law. The Tribunal found the charges of under-invoicing against the appellants valid, distinguishing the case from precedents and noting corroborating evidence. The decision was made on 12.04.2019. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 12 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378504