<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 944 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378500</link>
    <description>Royalty and penalty on excavated ordinary earth cannot be imposed merely because the earth was dug up; liability depends on actual end use. Under the mining notification, ordinary earth is treated as a minor mineral only when used for filling or levelling in construction of embankments, roads, railways or buildings. Where the material is not shown to have been used for those notified purposes, a notice under Section 48(7) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code cannot be sustained. On the stated facts, use for levelling agricultural land for cultivation fell outside the notification, so the notice and consequential proceedings were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2019 14:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 944 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378500</link>
      <description>Royalty and penalty on excavated ordinary earth cannot be imposed merely because the earth was dug up; liability depends on actual end use. Under the mining notification, ordinary earth is treated as a minor mineral only when used for filling or levelling in construction of embankments, roads, railways or buildings. Where the material is not shown to have been used for those notified purposes, a notice under Section 48(7) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code cannot be sustained. On the stated facts, use for levelling agricultural land for cultivation fell outside the notification, so the notice and consequential proceedings were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378500</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>