<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 939 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378495</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the applicant is an operational creditor, and the claim for arrears of rent constitutes an operational debt. However, a bona fide dispute regarding the area of the premises and the rent rate necessitated further investigation. Consequently, the application was deemed not maintainable under Section 9 of the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code, leading to the rejection of the petition without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2019 14:38:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 939 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378495</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the applicant is an operational creditor, and the claim for arrears of rent constitutes an operational debt. However, a bona fide dispute regarding the area of the premises and the rent rate necessitated further investigation. Consequently, the application was deemed not maintainable under Section 9 of the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code, leading to the rejection of the petition without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>