<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 936 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378492</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s application for condonation of a 1786-day delay in filing an appeal against an Order-in-Appeal. The appellant&#039;s explanation citing reliance on accountants and auditors was deemed insufficient, with the Tribunal finding no ambiguity in the impugned order. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed on 29.01.2019, as the delay was considered excessive and lacking valid justification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2019 14:23:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 936 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378492</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s application for condonation of a 1786-day delay in filing an appeal against an Order-in-Appeal. The appellant&#039;s explanation citing reliance on accountants and auditors was deemed insufficient, with the Tribunal finding no ambiguity in the impugned order. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed on 29.01.2019, as the delay was considered excessive and lacking valid justification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378492</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>