<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 935 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378491</link>
    <description>The appeals were allowed, and the impugned order confiscating seized goods, confirming demand of duties, and imposing penalties was set aside with consequential relief. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of concrete, corroborative, and reliable evidence to establish the charges of clandestine manufacture and removal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2019 14:21:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 935 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378491</link>
      <description>The appeals were allowed, and the impugned order confiscating seized goods, confirming demand of duties, and imposing penalties was set aside with consequential relief. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of concrete, corroborative, and reliable evidence to establish the charges of clandestine manufacture and removal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378491</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>