https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378453 The judgment upheld the denial of CENVAT Credit on outdoor catering service amounting to Rs. 4,77,791/- due to inadmissibility post-April 2011. The Appellant's argument on limitation period for recovery was rejected, with the recovery deemed within the normal limitation period. The imposition of penalty was deemed unwarranted due to conflicting Tribunal views, directing the Appellant to reverse the credit with interest but absolving them of any penalty. The appeals were disposed of, maintaining the denial of credit while eliminating penalty imposition. en-us Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Apr 2019 15:31:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378453 The judgment upheld the denial of CENVAT Credit on outdoor catering service amounting to Rs. 4,77,791/- due to inadmissibility post-April 2011. The Appellant's argument on limitation period for recovery was rejected, with the recovery deemed within the normal limitation period. The imposition of penalty was deemed unwarranted due to conflicting Tribunal views, directing the Appellant to reverse the credit with interest but absolving them of any penalty. The appeals were disposed of, maintaining the denial of credit while eliminating penalty imposition. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378453