https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378452 The Tribunal rejected the miscellaneous application for rectification, emphasizing that all issues raised by the Appellant had been duly considered in the original order. Revisiting the issues would contravene the legal principle established by the Supreme Court, as per the judgment in CCE Belapur Vs M/s RDC Concrete. This decision underscores the importance of thorough consideration of all issues during proceedings and the limitations on revisiting issues already addressed in an order. It highlights the necessity for parties to present all relevant arguments and evidence initially to avoid the need for subsequent rectifications or reviews. en-us Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Apr 2019 15:31:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378452 The Tribunal rejected the miscellaneous application for rectification, emphasizing that all issues raised by the Appellant had been duly considered in the original order. Revisiting the issues would contravene the legal principle established by the Supreme Court, as per the judgment in CCE Belapur Vs M/s RDC Concrete. This decision underscores the importance of thorough consideration of all issues during proceedings and the limitations on revisiting issues already addressed in an order. It highlights the necessity for parties to present all relevant arguments and evidence initially to avoid the need for subsequent rectifications or reviews. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378452