<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 867 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378423</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the penalty levied under section 271AAB of the Income Tax Act was not sustainable. The Assessing Officer failed to specify the grounds for the penalty in the show cause notice, and the income recorded in the diary did not meet the definition of &#039;undisclosed income.&#039; The Tribunal emphasized the discretionary nature of the penalty and allowed the appeal, resulting in the deletion of the penalty imposed on the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2019 12:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567051" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 867 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378423</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the penalty levied under section 271AAB of the Income Tax Act was not sustainable. The Assessing Officer failed to specify the grounds for the penalty in the show cause notice, and the income recorded in the diary did not meet the definition of &#039;undisclosed income.&#039; The Tribunal emphasized the discretionary nature of the penalty and allowed the appeal, resulting in the deletion of the penalty imposed on the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378423</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>