https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378420 The Court denied the Petitioner's requests regarding the validity of service of notice of assessment, ownership of paintings put to auction, and legality of auction proceedings. It emphasized the need for the Petitioner to exhaust statutory appellate remedies before seeking relief through writ jurisdiction. The Court directed the Petitioner to file appeals against the assessment orders by a specified date, ensuring a hearing on merits without reference to the limitation period. The interim arrangement sought by the Petitioner was also rejected, and the case was disposed of, leaving all contentions open for appellate proceedings. en-us Mon, 01 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Apr 2019 14:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378420 The Court denied the Petitioner's requests regarding the validity of service of notice of assessment, ownership of paintings put to auction, and legality of auction proceedings. It emphasized the need for the Petitioner to exhaust statutory appellate remedies before seeking relief through writ jurisdiction. The Court directed the Petitioner to file appeals against the assessment orders by a specified date, ensuring a hearing on merits without reference to the limitation period. The interim arrangement sought by the Petitioner was also rejected, and the case was disposed of, leaving all contentions open for appellate proceedings. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 01 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378420