https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378419 The court allowed the petition, setting aside the provisional attachment of the petitioner's bank accounts under Section 281B as the Revenue failed to justify its actions. Notices issued under Section 226(3) were set aside for being premature. Rejection of stay applications under Section 220(6) was deemed unsustainable, granting an unconditional stay. Refunds adjusted without proper intimation were directed to be refunded. The court criticized Revenue Officers for unfair conduct, ordering them to pay costs to the petitioner. en-us Tue, 26 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Aug 2019 10:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378419 The court allowed the petition, setting aside the provisional attachment of the petitioner's bank accounts under Section 281B as the Revenue failed to justify its actions. Notices issued under Section 226(3) were set aside for being premature. Rejection of stay applications under Section 220(6) was deemed unsustainable, granting an unconditional stay. Refunds adjusted without proper intimation were directed to be refunded. The court criticized Revenue Officers for unfair conduct, ordering them to pay costs to the petitioner. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 26 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378419