<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 859 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378415</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging an Income Tax Appellate Tribunal decision that allowed an Assessee Company to debit Rs. 90 lakhs as &#039;General Expenses&#039; for a corporate guarantee given to a sister concern. The Tribunal accepted the claim, considering the sister concern as a subsidiary of the Assessee. Citing a similar precedent, the Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, finding the circumstances aligned with established legal principles. As there was no dispute on the transaction&#039;s nature and the companies&#039; relationship, the Court concluded that there was no basis for interference, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2019 15:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567040" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 859 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378415</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging an Income Tax Appellate Tribunal decision that allowed an Assessee Company to debit Rs. 90 lakhs as &#039;General Expenses&#039; for a corporate guarantee given to a sister concern. The Tribunal accepted the claim, considering the sister concern as a subsidiary of the Assessee. Citing a similar precedent, the Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, finding the circumstances aligned with established legal principles. As there was no dispute on the transaction&#039;s nature and the companies&#039; relationship, the Court concluded that there was no basis for interference, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378415</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>