<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 856 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378412</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, modifying the CIT(A)&#039;s order to estimate the Gross Profit on purchases from RTIL at 0.11% and sustain the addition to that extent. The Tribunal found the assessee had taken steps to prove purchase genuineness, criticizing the AO&#039;s lack of material evidence. The decision was rendered on 12th April 2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2019 15:13:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 856 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378412</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, modifying the CIT(A)&#039;s order to estimate the Gross Profit on purchases from RTIL at 0.11% and sustain the addition to that extent. The Tribunal found the assessee had taken steps to prove purchase genuineness, criticizing the AO&#039;s lack of material evidence. The decision was rendered on 12th April 2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378412</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>