<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (2) TMI 26 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17703</link>
    <description>The court held that the business activities of the assessee, involving mining and processing marble and limestone, did not qualify as manufacturing or production under the Income-tax Act. As the activities did not result in a transformation leading to a new and distinct article, the assessee was not entitled to relief under section 80HH. The court emphasized that for an activity to be considered manufacturing, it must result in a product with a different name, character, or use. Therefore, the assessee&#039;s claim was denied, and the matter was referred back to the Tribunal for further action in accordance with the court&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:37:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (2) TMI 26 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17703</link>
      <description>The court held that the business activities of the assessee, involving mining and processing marble and limestone, did not qualify as manufacturing or production under the Income-tax Act. As the activities did not result in a transformation leading to a new and distinct article, the assessee was not entitled to relief under section 80HH. The court emphasized that for an activity to be considered manufacturing, it must result in a product with a different name, character, or use. Therefore, the assessee&#039;s claim was denied, and the matter was referred back to the Tribunal for further action in accordance with the court&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17703</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>