https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279999 The court dismissed the Review of Order Mistake (ROM) filed by the Department against the Final Order, finding no apparent mistake in the impugned order. It was held that in the case of ROM, a review of the appeal is not permissible, supported by legal precedents such as Prajatantra Prachar Samity vs CIT, CIT vs McDowell & Co Ltd., M/s Bhagat Construction Store vs CIT, and CIT Vs Malwa Texturising (P) Ltd. The decision to dismiss the ROM was based on a thorough analysis of the legal precedents cited, ensuring a well-founded outcome. en-us Fri, 20 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:34:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279999 The court dismissed the Review of Order Mistake (ROM) filed by the Department against the Final Order, finding no apparent mistake in the impugned order. It was held that in the case of ROM, a review of the appeal is not permissible, supported by legal precedents such as Prajatantra Prachar Samity vs CIT, CIT vs McDowell & Co Ltd., M/s Bhagat Construction Store vs CIT, and CIT Vs Malwa Texturising (P) Ltd. The decision to dismiss the ROM was based on a thorough analysis of the legal precedents cited, ensuring a well-founded outcome. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 20 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279999