https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279992 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT New Delhi allowed the appeal filed by the appellant against the revocation of the CHA license, forfeiture of the security deposit, and imposition of penalty under the CBLR 2013. The Tribunal set aside the revocation order due to non-compliance with the prescribed procedural timelines, leading to the consequential setting aside of the forfeiture of the security deposit. The penalty imposed was also inferred to be set aside as part of the overall relief granted to the appellant. The decision emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory procedures in disciplinary actions. en-us Tue, 25 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:33:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279992 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT New Delhi allowed the appeal filed by the appellant against the revocation of the CHA license, forfeiture of the security deposit, and imposition of penalty under the CBLR 2013. The Tribunal set aside the revocation order due to non-compliance with the prescribed procedural timelines, leading to the consequential setting aside of the forfeiture of the security deposit. The penalty imposed was also inferred to be set aside as part of the overall relief granted to the appellant. The decision emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory procedures in disciplinary actions. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 25 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279992