https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279993 An ITAT appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution after the assessee repeatedly sought adjournments, failed to cure registry defects, and did not appear on the final hearing date. The Tribunal treated the absence of appearance and no adjournment request as a lack of interest in pursuing the appeal and, following Multiplan (India) Ltd. and Late Tukojirao Holkar, dismissed the matter. The operative point is that persistent non-appearance and failure to prosecute can result in dismissal without examination of the merits. en-us Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:33:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279993 An ITAT appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution after the assessee repeatedly sought adjournments, failed to cure registry defects, and did not appear on the final hearing date. The Tribunal treated the absence of appearance and no adjournment request as a lack of interest in pursuing the appeal and, following Multiplan (India) Ltd. and Late Tukojirao Holkar, dismissed the matter. The operative point is that persistent non-appearance and failure to prosecute can result in dismissal without examination of the merits. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279993