<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1689 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279997</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals against the order-in-appeal upholding the service tax demand for taxi services due to a 319-day delay in filing, despite citing financial difficulties for the delay. The Tribunal held that financial difficulties alone were not sufficient justification for the significant delay, emphasizing the importance of timely compliance with procedural requirements in tax appeals to avoid dismissal on grounds of delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:33:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=567002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1689 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279997</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals against the order-in-appeal upholding the service tax demand for taxi services due to a 319-day delay in filing, despite citing financial difficulties for the delay. The Tribunal held that financial difficulties alone were not sufficient justification for the significant delay, emphasizing the importance of timely compliance with procedural requirements in tax appeals to avoid dismissal on grounds of delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279997</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>