<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 98 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17697</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing that the concealment of income was not proven, justifying the cancellation of the penalty under section 271(1)(c). The Court highlighted that the findings were based on factual analysis and evidence, precluding the need for a legal reference to the High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:26:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56697" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 98 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17697</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing that the concealment of income was not proven, justifying the cancellation of the penalty under section 271(1)(c). The Court highlighted that the findings were based on factual analysis and evidence, precluding the need for a legal reference to the High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17697</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>