<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (8) TMI 53 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17696</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the expenditure incurred for the education of a partner in the U.S.A. as business expenditure for assessment years 1983-84 to 1985-86. The Court found the expenditure to be wholly and exclusively for business purposes, aligning with section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It concluded that the expenditure was not capital expenditure or personal expenses but rather revenue expenditure, as it benefited the firm by enhancing business operations. The Court dismissed the cases without costs, determining that the issues raised were not referable questions of law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:24:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56696" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (8) TMI 53 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17696</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the expenditure incurred for the education of a partner in the U.S.A. as business expenditure for assessment years 1983-84 to 1985-86. The Court found the expenditure to be wholly and exclusively for business purposes, aligning with section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It concluded that the expenditure was not capital expenditure or personal expenses but rather revenue expenditure, as it benefited the firm by enhancing business operations. The Court dismissed the cases without costs, determining that the issues raised were not referable questions of law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>