<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1917 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279981</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Miscellaneous Application filed by the assessee as it was beyond the prescribed limitation period under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory timelines for seeking relief and clarified that orders passed in breach of Tribunal Rules are irregular but not void, requiring legal proceedings to establish their invalidity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2019 11:54:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=566948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1917 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279981</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Miscellaneous Application filed by the assessee as it was beyond the prescribed limitation period under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory timelines for seeking relief and clarified that orders passed in breach of Tribunal Rules are irregular but not void, requiring legal proceedings to establish their invalidity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279981</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>