<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 844 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378400</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court declined to entertain the special leave petition because the High Court had considered only two additional questions in the impugned judgment, while other issues were stated to remain pending before the High Court. The Court therefore found no reason to intervene at that stage and dismissed the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 14:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=566932" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 844 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378400</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court declined to entertain the special leave petition because the High Court had considered only two additional questions in the impugned judgment, while other issues were stated to remain pending before the High Court. The Court therefore found no reason to intervene at that stage and dismissed the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378400</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>