<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 832 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378388</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the penalty of Rs. 2,15,500 imposed on the assessee under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. Relying on judicial precedent, the Tribunal concluded that surrendering exemption during assessment proceedings did not constitute furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The Tribunal found the facts similar to a previous case where the penalty was deleted, leading to the decision in favor of the assessee in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2019 07:08:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=566919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 832 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378388</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the penalty of Rs. 2,15,500 imposed on the assessee under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. Relying on judicial precedent, the Tribunal concluded that surrendering exemption during assessment proceedings did not constitute furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The Tribunal found the facts similar to a previous case where the penalty was deleted, leading to the decision in favor of the assessee in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>