<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 831 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378387</link>
    <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, citing lack of clarity in the penalty notice specifying the nature of penalty proceedings. Relying on legal precedents emphasizing the importance of clarity in penalty notices, the Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, setting aside the penalty order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2019 07:08:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=566918" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 831 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378387</link>
      <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, citing lack of clarity in the penalty notice specifying the nature of penalty proceedings. Relying on legal precedents emphasizing the importance of clarity in penalty notices, the Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, setting aside the penalty order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378387</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>