<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 830 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378386</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, directing the AO to re-examine the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) in light of the retrospective application of the second proviso. The judgment emphasized the curative and retrospective nature of the provision, following established legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2019 07:08:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=566916" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 830 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378386</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, directing the AO to re-examine the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) in light of the retrospective application of the second proviso. The judgment emphasized the curative and retrospective nature of the provision, following established legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378386</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>