<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 826 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378382</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, finding the notice issued was invalid due to ambiguity. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, emphasizing the importance of clear and specific grounds in penalty notices to comply with natural justice principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2019 07:06:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=566912" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 826 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378382</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, finding the notice issued was invalid due to ambiguity. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, emphasizing the importance of clear and specific grounds in penalty notices to comply with natural justice principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378382</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>