https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378374 The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the search and seizure operation conducted by the Income Tax Department. It ruled in favor of the respondent, upholding the legality of the operation under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court found the search warrant duly authorized, accepted ownership of the seized jewellery by a family member, and emphasized the limited scope of interference by the High Court in such matters. Despite procedural objections raised by the petitioners, the Court concluded that the operation was conducted in accordance with the law, leading to the dismissal of the petition. en-us Thu, 04 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Apr 2019 06:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378374 The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the search and seizure operation conducted by the Income Tax Department. It ruled in favor of the respondent, upholding the legality of the operation under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court found the search warrant duly authorized, accepted ownership of the seized jewellery by a family member, and emphasized the limited scope of interference by the High Court in such matters. Despite procedural objections raised by the petitioners, the Court concluded that the operation was conducted in accordance with the law, leading to the dismissal of the petition. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 04 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378374