<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 813 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378369</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand on commitment charges, ruling them as taxable interest. The demand was beyond the show cause notice&#039;s scope, leading to its dismissal. The Department&#039;s attempt to extend the limitation period was rejected due to lack of evidence, resulting in the appeal being allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2019 06:16:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=566892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 813 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378369</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand on commitment charges, ruling them as taxable interest. The demand was beyond the show cause notice&#039;s scope, leading to its dismissal. The Department&#039;s attempt to extend the limitation period was rejected due to lack of evidence, resulting in the appeal being allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378369</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>