<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Finds Lack of Evidence for Prima Facie Case; Restraint Order on Appellants Deemed Harsh and Unjustified.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=45883</link>
    <description>There should be some shred of evidence to come to a prima-facie conclusion that the appellants are indulging in unfair trade practices in cornering the market with a manipulative intent to manipulate the price. Passing a restraint order which virtually puts a stoppage on the appellants right to trade based on a needle of suspicion, in our opinion, is harsh and unwarranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2019 06:45:23 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2019 06:45:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=566835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Finds Lack of Evidence for Prima Facie Case; Restraint Order on Appellants Deemed Harsh and Unjustified.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=45883</link>
      <description>There should be some shred of evidence to come to a prima-facie conclusion that the appellants are indulging in unfair trade practices in cornering the market with a manipulative intent to manipulate the price. Passing a restraint order which virtually puts a stoppage on the appellants right to trade based on a needle of suspicion, in our opinion, is harsh and unwarranted.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2019 06:45:23 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=45883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>