https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378355 The Tribunal confirmed jurisdiction over the matter, found the application compliant with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, dismissed objections regarding pending legal proceedings, ruled the application within the limitation period, upheld the validity of the deed of assignment, disregarded disputes over amounts due, affirmed the authority of the applicant's signatory, allowed the application despite pending winding-up petitions, and recognized the applicant as a financial creditor. The application was admitted under Section 7 of the Code, appointing an Interim Resolution Professional and imposing a moratorium on actions against the corporate debtor. en-us Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Apr 2019 06:43:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378355 The Tribunal confirmed jurisdiction over the matter, found the application compliant with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, dismissed objections regarding pending legal proceedings, ruled the application within the limitation period, upheld the validity of the deed of assignment, disregarded disputes over amounts due, affirmed the authority of the applicant's signatory, allowed the application despite pending winding-up petitions, and recognized the applicant as a financial creditor. The application was admitted under Section 7 of the Code, appointing an Interim Resolution Professional and imposing a moratorium on actions against the corporate debtor. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Fri, 08 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378355