https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378354 The tribunal admitted the application under Section 7(5)(a) of the Code, finding that the default had occurred, the application was complete, and there were no disciplinary proceedings against the proposed Interim Resolution Professional (IRP). Mr. Vivek Raheja was appointed as the IRP, and a moratorium was declared as per Section 14 of the Code. The IRP was instructed to carry out duties as per the Code, and all personnel associated with the corporate debtor were directed to cooperate with the IRP. en-us Fri, 01 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Apr 2019 06:42:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378354 The tribunal admitted the application under Section 7(5)(a) of the Code, finding that the default had occurred, the application was complete, and there were no disciplinary proceedings against the proposed Interim Resolution Professional (IRP). Mr. Vivek Raheja was appointed as the IRP, and a moratorium was declared as per Section 14 of the Code. The IRP was instructed to carry out duties as per the Code, and all personnel associated with the corporate debtor were directed to cooperate with the IRP. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Fri, 01 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378354