https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378350 Alternative statutory remedy under the Telangana Value Added Tax Act did not bar writ jurisdiction in the facts, because Article 226 remains available despite an appellate remedy and the delay in approaching the court was not treated as fatal. The Court also found that the assessee had not earlier received a meaningful opportunity to place its case before the revisional authority, particularly on the absence of a July 2010 entry and the revised June 2010 return. The revisional assessment order was therefore set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration after notice, objections and personal hearing. en-us Wed, 30 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Apr 2019 06:34:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378350 Alternative statutory remedy under the Telangana Value Added Tax Act did not bar writ jurisdiction in the facts, because Article 226 remains available despite an appellate remedy and the delay in approaching the court was not treated as fatal. The Court also found that the assessee had not earlier received a meaningful opportunity to place its case before the revisional authority, particularly on the absence of a July 2010 entry and the revised June 2010 return. The revisional assessment order was therefore set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration after notice, objections and personal hearing. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 30 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378350