https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378348 A statutory appeal under the Reserve Bank of India Act does not by itself bar writ jurisdiction under Article 226 where breach of natural justice is alleged. A writ remains maintainable when the petitioner approaches within limitation and the alternative remedy objection is not fatal. For cancellation of registration, the statute requires a reasonable opportunity of hearing, but not necessarily an oral hearing in every case. Where the material breach is admitted, no actual prejudice is shown, and the authority considers the written reply with reasons, natural justice is satisfied; the cancellation order was therefore upheld and the writ challenge failed. en-us Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Apr 2019 06:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378348 A statutory appeal under the Reserve Bank of India Act does not by itself bar writ jurisdiction under Article 226 where breach of natural justice is alleged. A writ remains maintainable when the petitioner approaches within limitation and the alternative remedy objection is not fatal. For cancellation of registration, the statute requires a reasonable opportunity of hearing, but not necessarily an oral hearing in every case. Where the material breach is admitted, no actual prejudice is shown, and the authority considers the written reply with reasons, natural justice is satisfied; the cancellation order was therefore upheld and the writ challenge failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378348