<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (3) TMI 81 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17682</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s findings in the case. Tea bushes were classified as capital assets, trees sold had no ascertainable cost of acquisition, and profit from timber sale was not taxable as capital gains. The computation of written down value and the non-applicability of section 40A(8) to current account balances were affirmed. The court&#039;s decisions were sent to the Tribunal for implementation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 11:32:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (3) TMI 81 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17682</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s findings in the case. Tea bushes were classified as capital assets, trees sold had no ascertainable cost of acquisition, and profit from timber sale was not taxable as capital gains. The computation of written down value and the non-applicability of section 40A(8) to current account balances were affirmed. The court&#039;s decisions were sent to the Tribunal for implementation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17682</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>