<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 771 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378327</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision emphasized the importance of clearly specifying charges in penalty notices to ensure fairness and proper application of the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2019 05:57:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=566792" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 771 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378327</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision emphasized the importance of clearly specifying charges in penalty notices to ensure fairness and proper application of the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378327</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>