<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 763 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378319</link>
    <description>Tax collection at source under section 206C(1C) applies where, despite the form of a concession agreement, the recipient entity in substance acts as the grantor and collects toll or concession receipts on its own account. The arrangement was read with the Punjab Infrastructure (Development &amp; Regulation) Act, 2002, and the board&#039;s actual conduct-retaining the receipts in its own funds and using them for its own purposes-supported principal-to-principal treatment. The fact that the concessionaire may have filed returns and paid tax did not displace the board&#039;s statutory TCS obligation. Consequential interest under section 206C(7) and penalty under section 271CA were also sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 15:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=566782" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 763 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378319</link>
      <description>Tax collection at source under section 206C(1C) applies where, despite the form of a concession agreement, the recipient entity in substance acts as the grantor and collects toll or concession receipts on its own account. The arrangement was read with the Punjab Infrastructure (Development &amp; Regulation) Act, 2002, and the board&#039;s actual conduct-retaining the receipts in its own funds and using them for its own purposes-supported principal-to-principal treatment. The fact that the concessionaire may have filed returns and paid tax did not displace the board&#039;s statutory TCS obligation. Consequential interest under section 206C(7) and penalty under section 271CA were also sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378319</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>