<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 750 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378306</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the application for rectification, amending the Final Order to grant the benefit of the Exemption Notification dated 6 September 1995 to non-virgin polychips from 1 March 1994, in accordance with the Supreme Industries Ltd. decision. The Tribunal found that the non-consideration of the relevant judgment constituted a mistake apparent from the record, rectifiable under Section 35C(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2019 15:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=566765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 750 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378306</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the application for rectification, amending the Final Order to grant the benefit of the Exemption Notification dated 6 September 1995 to non-virgin polychips from 1 March 1994, in accordance with the Supreme Industries Ltd. decision. The Tribunal found that the non-consideration of the relevant judgment constituted a mistake apparent from the record, rectifiable under Section 35C(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=378306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>