<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1593 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279961</link>
    <description>A security bond executed in Form XIX to obtain stay in tax appeal proceedings remains effective only while the appeal is pending; once the appeal is remanded, it becomes unenforceable under Rule 31(1) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Rules, 1959. Recovery could not therefore be initiated on the basis of that bond. The department also could not proceed against a person who was only a legal heir of a deceased director and not a director or otherwise personally liable for the company&#039;s dues, absent a fresh lawful basis or bond. The recovery notice was held without jurisdiction and illegal, and the documents furnished under Form XIX were directed to be released.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2019 05:44:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=566750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1593 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279961</link>
      <description>A security bond executed in Form XIX to obtain stay in tax appeal proceedings remains effective only while the appeal is pending; once the appeal is remanded, it becomes unenforceable under Rule 31(1) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Rules, 1959. Recovery could not therefore be initiated on the basis of that bond. The department also could not proceed against a person who was only a legal heir of a deceased director and not a director or otherwise personally liable for the company&#039;s dues, absent a fresh lawful basis or bond. The recovery notice was held without jurisdiction and illegal, and the documents furnished under Form XIX were directed to be released.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279961</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>