<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (4) TMI 54 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17675</link>
    <description>Sales tax paid before furnishing the return under section 139(1) was deductible under section 43B, and the addition could be deleted if payment was made within that time. The proviso to section 43B was treated as procedural and applied retrospectively to earlier assessment years. The Tribunal&#039;s direction to verify payment before the due date was upheld, and the settled view favouring the assessee was accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 11:15:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56675" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (4) TMI 54 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17675</link>
      <description>Sales tax paid before furnishing the return under section 139(1) was deductible under section 43B, and the addition could be deleted if payment was made within that time. The proviso to section 43B was treated as procedural and applied retrospectively to earlier assessment years. The Tribunal&#039;s direction to verify payment before the due date was upheld, and the settled view favouring the assessee was accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17675</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>