<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1672 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279959</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the impugned orders and remanded the matters to the Tribunal for a fresh decision after providing an opportunity for both parties to be heard. The Court found merit in the arguments presented by the Revenue and concluded that the Tribunal had based its decision on an earlier case concerning the same assessee, leading to the penalties being wrongly deleted. The High Court agreed with the Revenue&#039;s request for setting aside the impugned orders and remanding the matters for a fresh decision in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2019 05:44:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=566748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1672 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279959</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the impugned orders and remanded the matters to the Tribunal for a fresh decision after providing an opportunity for both parties to be heard. The Court found merit in the arguments presented by the Revenue and concluded that the Tribunal had based its decision on an earlier case concerning the same assessee, leading to the penalties being wrongly deleted. The High Court agreed with the Revenue&#039;s request for setting aside the impugned orders and remanding the matters for a fresh decision in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279959</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>