<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1793 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279963</link>
    <description>The tribunal confirmed the jurisdiction of the JCIT and partially allowed the quantum appeals for statistical purposes. The penalty appeals were allowed, canceling the penalties imposed under section 272(A)(2)(e) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, due to the assessee&#039;s bona fide belief and cooperation promised for the reassessment process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2019 05:44:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=566740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1793 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279963</link>
      <description>The tribunal confirmed the jurisdiction of the JCIT and partially allowed the quantum appeals for statistical purposes. The penalty appeals were allowed, canceling the penalties imposed under section 272(A)(2)(e) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, due to the assessee&#039;s bona fide belief and cooperation promised for the reassessment process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>