<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 796 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279949</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court of India dismissed a petition seeking a ban on the slaughter of cows, buffaloes, horses, and chameleons, emphasizing that such decisions fall under legislative purview and cannot be imposed by the judiciary. The Court reiterated that Parliament has the authority to enact laws, and the judiciary cannot compel the legislature to pass specific legislation. Therefore, the Court concluded that it could not grant the requested relief through the writ petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 16:04:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=566728" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 796 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279949</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court of India dismissed a petition seeking a ban on the slaughter of cows, buffaloes, horses, and chameleons, emphasizing that such decisions fall under legislative purview and cannot be imposed by the judiciary. The Court reiterated that Parliament has the authority to enact laws, and the judiciary cannot compel the legislature to pass specific legislation. Therefore, the Court concluded that it could not grant the requested relief through the writ petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279949</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>