https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279947 Use of even part of premises let solely for residence for a different scheduled purpose, without the landlord's written consent, constitutes a change of user under the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act and attracts eviction. The statutory wording does not require conversion of the entire building; the altered use of part of the premises is legally sufficient where the building's character is changed from residential to a scheduled use. A plea of waiver or acquiescence will fail unless the landlord's consent or conduct is clearly proved, and mere assertion of estoppel is insufficient without supporting material. en-us Tue, 12 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Apr 2019 14:41:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279947 Use of even part of premises let solely for residence for a different scheduled purpose, without the landlord's written consent, constitutes a change of user under the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act and attracts eviction. The statutory wording does not require conversion of the entire building; the altered use of part of the premises is legally sufficient where the building's character is changed from residential to a scheduled use. A plea of waiver or acquiescence will fail unless the landlord's consent or conduct is clearly proved, and mere assertion of estoppel is insufficient without supporting material. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 12 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279947