<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (4) TMI 453 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279944</link>
    <description>A municipal employee on probation did not acquire deemed confirmation merely by completing the probation period, because the governing service rule required successful completion of probation, prescribed departmental examinations, and an express order of confirmation. The later Government service rules had superseded the earlier municipal recruitment rules, so the employee could not rely on the former municipal rule. As the employee remained a probationer, the appointing authority could terminate service on one calendar month&#039;s notice without a disciplinary enquiry reserved for confirmed employees. The appeal succeeded, the employee&#039;s decree was set aside, and the dismissal of the suit was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 10:12:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=566708" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (4) TMI 453 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279944</link>
      <description>A municipal employee on probation did not acquire deemed confirmation merely by completing the probation period, because the governing service rule required successful completion of probation, prescribed departmental examinations, and an express order of confirmation. The later Government service rules had superseded the earlier municipal recruitment rules, so the employee could not rely on the former municipal rule. As the employee remained a probationer, the appointing authority could terminate service on one calendar month&#039;s notice without a disciplinary enquiry reserved for confirmed employees. The appeal succeeded, the employee&#039;s decree was set aside, and the dismissal of the suit was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279944</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>